Obama says voter rights threatened from ID laws

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

NEW YORK (CNN) — If President Barack Obama’s remarks Thursday at Lyndon Johnson’s presidential library were meant to honor the legacy of the civil rights movement, Friday’s speech to a rights group in New York focused on an area where activists say work remains in achieving racial equality.

Obama addressed voting rights as part of his speech to Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, continuing the White House’s effort to spotlight Republican-backed measures they say place undue hardships on voting for minorities, students and immigrants.

They hope the issue will help galvanize voters to elect Democrats in this year’s midterm elections, where the party’s control of the Senate appears in jeopardy.

Obama said on Friday the right to vote is “threatened today” in a way that hasn’t been seen since before the Voting Rights Act became law nearly 50 years ago.

He said he’s not against “reasonable attempts to secure the vote.” But he said he is against rules requiring IDs that millions of Americans don’t have. Not having such required identification “shouldn’t prevent you from exercising your right to vote,” he said.

Vice President Joe Biden and Attorney General Eric Holder have both taken on the issue in the past week, each declaring that voting rights were a top priority for the administration.

Obama’s Justice Department has filed suit against Texas and North Carolina, seeking to block proposed voter ID laws in each state and claiming the regulations are discriminatory to people who don’t have photo identification — a group that includes a large number of minorities.

Proponents of voter ID laws say they’re designed to prevent fraud at the ballot box.

North Carolina’s law also shortened the period of early voting, eliminated same-day registration, and put some restrictions on how provisional ballots are counted.

A rash of new voting laws — and the subsequent lawsuits — are a consequence of last year’s Supreme Court decision that struck down a portion of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The invalidated section required certain states to obtain permission from the federal government before altering voting laws.

In the ruling, justices said Congress must re-determine how places are put on the list using updated data — a tough proposition for a body already mired in partisan gridlock. Lawmakers last reauthorized that “pre-clearance” requirement in 2006 without making any major changes to the method of how a place is included on the list of states needing federal permission.

House and Senate lawmakers have introduced bipartisan measures that would require states with recent voting violations to have their proposed changes approved by the federal government, though voter ID laws would be permitted.

The White House hasn’t said yet whether Obama would support the measure, saying only the President welcomed Congressional action on the issue.

The original voting rights act was passed in 1965 under President Lyndon B. Johnson, whose legacy Obama hailed on Thursday during remarks in Austin.

Obama, along with three other living presidents, convened at the library this week to mark the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act, which for the first time outlawed discrimination in public places.

During his remarks, President Bill Clinton accused those who support new voting laws of retracting important progress in achieving equality.

“We all know what this is about. This is a way of restricting the franchise after 50 years of expanding it,” Clinton said.

By Kevin Liptak


  • jack

    Completely and totally outrageous.. I guess he missed the news about the woman in Ohio who voted for HIM …………six times…………, and was convicted for it, and spent less than six months in jail.. Obama’s justice department refused to prosecute her.. And to top it all off, she was a poll worker… She knew exactly what she was doing. When she was released from jail, she was treated as a DEMOCRAT HERO.. IF VOTER ID was required in Ohio, this could not have happened. This PRESIDENT IS A FREAKING LIAR.. I bet 95% of those who read this post never saw this on the news…. because the media suppressed it.

  • middleman

    How hard is it to get a picture ID? A citizen who wants to vote should be responsible for obtaining an ID. Who is threatened by such an benign requirement? People who really want voter fraud because playing fair will not get them elected? Why don’t all those people not have picture IDs? If someone is so opposed to the requirement because of some hardship, why don’t they just have a “get a picture ID” day?

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.