Iraq crisis: U.S. moves firepower to region as ISIS advance continues

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) — As Islamic militants continue their murderous advance in Iraq, the Pentagon is moving more firepower and manpower into the region to prepare for whatever U.S. President Barack Obama orders.

Already at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, dozens of Marines and Army troops have moved in to beef up security. Another 100 personnel are in the region to provide support if needed, the Pentagon said.

The aircraft carrier George H.W. Bush and five other warships are now in the Persian Gulf. More than 500 Marines and dozens of helicopters are on standby.

A top priority: evacuate all Americans at the embassy if it comes to that.

On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry, in an interview with Yahoo! News, acknowledged that airstrikes on Iraqi targets are under consideration.

“Well, they are not the whole answer, but they may well be one of the options that are important to be able to stem the tide and stop the movement of people who are moving around in open convoys and trucks and terrorizing people,” he said.

“When you have people murdering, assassinating in these mass massacres, you have to stop that and you do what you need to do.”

Meanwhile, the violence continued unabated.

ISIS fighters advanced Tuesday to the city of Baquba, about 37 miles (60 kilometers) north of Baghdad, where they clashed with Iraqi government forces, eyewitnesses in the city told CNN. ISIS militants stormed the police station there, took control and looted all the weapons before withdrawing.

Government forces have retained control of a number of neighborhoods in Baquba, Iraqi state TV reported. Citing Iraqi military spokesman Qasim Atta, the network reported that Iraqi security forces had killed nine militants near the police station and that ISIS had killed 52 people held in the local jail by throwing hand grenades inside.

Kurdish security sources also reported fighting around Saadiya, about 55 miles (89 kilometers) north of Baghdad, as Kurdish fighters, known as Peshmerga, seek to retake control from ISIS militants there. The two sides are also battling for control of Bashir village, southwest of Kirkuk city, as terrified civilians flee shelling by ISIS.


An unpalatable option

Among the options considered by the United States may be the politically unpalatable one of cooperating with Iran to stop militant gains.

While Kerry didn’t say that cooperation with Iran is under active discussion, he wouldn’t “rule out anything that would be constructive to providing real stability.”

“I think we are open to any constructive process here that could minimize the violence, hold Iraq together — the integrity of the country — and eliminate the presence of outside terrorist forces that are ripping it apart,” Kerry said.

His comments are the first time such a high-ranking U.S. official has made such a public statement since militants from the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, began an offensive that has seen vast swaths of northern Iraq fall out of government hands.

Iran plays a key role. It’s an ally of Iraq’s Shiite-led government. The ISIS militants are Sunni.

A senior security official in Baghdad told CNN last week that the country had sent about 500 Revolutionary Guard troops to help fight the ISIS militants. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani denied the report over the weekend, but said he would be open to helping if asked.

Given the forces at play, direct talks with Iranian officials are something some analysts favor.

“If we engage in a military action without a political solution, we will be seen as backing Maliki in a Sunni-Shia civil war. And that is exactly the opposite of what we want to do,” said Col. Peter Mansoor, retired.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s media adviser, Ali al Mosawi, told CNN on Tuesday that the Premier’s meeting with the U.S. ambassador to Iraq had been “productive” and that the two nations were coordinating to combat the terrorist threat.

The government hopes “there will be more cooperation from the American side to combat terrorism,” Mosawi said. “There is cooperation, but we are looking for more support.”


Tough choices

The United States and Iran held “very brief discussions” about Iraq and the threat posed by ISIS in Vienna, Austria, on Monday, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said.

Deputy Secretary of State William Burns is in Vienna for nuclear talks with Iran.

The Obama administration faces some tough choices should it opt to respond.

The U.S. has increased drone surveillance over western and northern Iraq in an effort to gather more intelligence. But using fighter jets to strike at militant targets could be difficult.

“It’s the same reason it was so hard to target them when we had 160,000 troops there: They intermingle with the people,” said retired Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling. “I think the uninitiated might say: ‘Hey, What’s so hard about that? Let’s just drop a couple bombs.’ ”

Obama has ruled out U.S. troops on the ground — a stance to which U.S. Sen. John McCain of Arizona has taken exception.

Approximately a dozen forward air controllers would be needed on the ground before any airstrike, the senator said.

“You need to have people identify the targets in order to really be effective. Remember we’re not talking about bombing in towns and cities. There are long stretches of that desert that they have to travel across in their vehicles with their guns on them,” McCain told reporters Monday on Capitol Hill.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told reporters Tuesday in Geneva, Switzerland, that he was “deeply concerned” about the rapidly deteriorating situation in Iraq.

“I encourage all Iraqi leaders — political, military, religious and community — to ensure that their followers avoid acts of reprisal and come together in an inclusive spirit to address this serious threat to the country.”

U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay on Monday condemned the violence, citing reports that “hundreds of non-combatant men were summarily executed over the past five days,” including surrendered soldiers and police.

“Although the numbers cannot be verified yet, this apparently systematic series of cold-blooded executions, mostly conducted in various locations in the Tikrit area, almost certainly amounts to war crimes,” she said.


Brutal images

As ISIS continues its violent march, capturing cities along the way, many fear its fighters may reach the capital, Baghdad.

The group, also known as the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant, has racked up several victories across Iraq in recent days, including the northwestern city of Tal Afar, two villages in Diyala province, and Iraq’s second-largest city, Mosul.

Hundreds of thousands have fled. And the crisis is now so dire that the government is pleading for volunteers to help fight the militants.

On Monday, a video surfaced that appeared to show a man in an Iraqi military uniform after he was shot in the face.

A militant fighter boasted on Facebook that he was proud of killing the man and said the video should be passed around to show what could happen to other Shiites.

The new images follow others apparently posted by ISIS to jihadi Internet forums appearing to show the executions of Iraqi security forces and a tweet, on what was claimed to be an ISIS account, saying its members had killed at least 1,700 Shiites.

CNN’s Nic Robertson reported from Baghdad and Laura Smith-Spark wrote in London. CNN’s Jim Sciutto, Barbara Starr and Raja Razek contributed to this report.

™ & © 2014 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.


  • Steven Sweeney

    Just waiting-for the liberals to call Obozo a war criminal and suggest he’s in bed with Halliburton.Of course the dog eating dictator is a regular criminal on multiple counts, and did give Halliburton the EXACT no bid contract Bush did.So there you go!

  • rose

    I agree with air strikes as they travel. These people need to be stopped now. They are worse than Sudan, even the Taliban and Al Qaeda fear the brutality of these people. We have already stuck our noses in a place we didn’t belong, we have gone too far and it’s too late. If they don’t eliminate these people, then every Soldier has died in vein, even though it seems they already have, this would make it totally true.

Comments are closed.