Ethical Society of Police calls for Stockley murder conviction

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

ST. LOUIS, MO — The Ethical Society of Police and the National Coalition of Law Enforcement Officers for Justice, Reform and Accountability have jointly released video and written statements supporting a conviction in the trial of former St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department officer Jason Stockley. The former officer faces murder charges in a police shooting.

Stockley’s trial ended last month, but Judge Timothy Wilson has yet to rule. Activists have threatened civil disobedience that could include shutting down highways, airports or businesses if Stockley is acquitted in the 2011 death of Anthony Lamar Smith.

It’s important to consider the judge’s ruling does not have to be as black-and-white as a lot of people assume. He can also find Stockley guilty of second-degree murder or voluntary manslaughter if he thinks the evidence fits a lesser offense better.

The shooting of a black suspect by a white officer reignited racial tensions in a region still healing from the 2014 fatal police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

The Ethical Society of Police released this statement about the pending verdict in the Stockley murder trial:

“The Board of the Ethical Society of Police (E.S.O.P.) believes that the great majority of officers within the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department (SLMPD) and around the world behave in a manner befitting of officers. However, when we as officers disregard internal policies and the laws we’ve sworn to uphold we must be held accountable. We aren’t above the law.

The board of the E.S.O.P. believes the case against former SLMPD Officer, Jason Stockley warrants a conviction, because of physical evidence, circumstantial evidence, questionable tactics, and numerous violations of SLMPD policies/procedures.

1. Officer Jason Stockley advised Anthony Lamar Smith “knocked him sideways”on the Church’s Chicken parking lot after Stockley and his partner, Brian Bianchi attempted to stop Smith for an alleged drug transaction. The video appears to show Smith hurriedly fleeing the officers and brushing Stockley’s unauthorized AK-47, causing Stockley to slightly lose his balance.

2. Stockley shoots at Smith’s fleeing vehicle. He didn’t shoot Smith with the AK-47, despite stating his life and his partner’s life was in danger. Stockley transitioned to his beretta instead.

3. Stockley stated his partner, Officer Brian Bianchi, yelled, “gun!”while on the Church’s Chicken parking lot. Bianchi holstered his weapon after allegedly yelling “gun!” That’s not a normal reaction of a law enforcement officer facing a subject that’s allegedly pointing a handgun at them, their partner, or reaching for a handgun. Video in fact, shows Bianchi’s weapon is holstered a second time when Stockley kills Smith.

4. Stockley stated at the trial Smith pointed a gun at him while he (Smith) was fleeing from the Church’s Chicken lot.
Smith, according to Stockley, was able to point a handgun at him while steering the vehicle and while maneuvering the gear shifts in reverse/drive on the Church’s Chicken parking lot.

5. Stockley is armed with an AK-47. This isn’t an authorized weapon. Carrying this weapon while on duty is a violation of Department policy.

6. Stockley’s Sergeant had advised him on a prior occasion not to come to work with the unauthorized AK-47, and Stockley stated he ignored the direct order because of the increasing violence in the City of St. Louis.

7. Stockley shoots at a fleeing vehicle. This is a violation of SLMPD’s Use of Force policy. We are not supposed to shoot at moving vehicles.

8. Bianchi drives at speeds in excess of 80 mph as he pursues Smith, whom is also driving at/or around the same speeds in slick and rainy conditions during midday traffic. When conditions become too unreasonable for safe driving the vehicle pursuit policy indicates we should end the pursuit. At one point, Bianchi lost control of the police vehicle and struck a fixed object.

9. Neither Bianchi or Stockley were heard on the police radio stating Smith was armed. Stockley did state “shots fired.” However, at trial Stockley stated he did tell the dispatcher Smith was armed, but he claimed the radio transmission and his partner, Officer Bianchi were the problem with hearing him.

10. During the pursuit, Jason Stockley told his partner, “We’re going to kill this motherfucker!” In trial, Stockley stated he had “no recollection” of saying these words despite it being his voice.

11. After stating “We’re going to kill this motherfucker!” Stockley ultimately directs Bianchi to strike Smith’s vehicle to end the pursuit. After the accident the vehicles stop. Intentionally ramming or striking a vehicle is a violation of SLMPD policy, and Officers aren’t taught to use any such maneuvers during a vehicle pursuit.

12. Stockley and Bianchi exit their police vehicle and approach Smith. Smith is shot by Stockley, who raised the airbag to shoot Smith. Stockley stated he believed Smith was reaching for a handgun. Brian Bianchi doesn’t shoot Smith. Bianchi’s gun is holstered. Stockley didn’t shoot Smith with the AK-47, despite stating his life and his partner’s life was in danger. Stockley decided to again transition to his beretta.

13. Stockley ultimately killed Smith, about 45 seconds after making the, “We’re going to kill this motherfucker!” statement. His words, then actions appear calculated, and premeditated. It is not out of the norm for fleeing suspects to surrender after initially resisting an officer.

14. After Stockley shot Smith, he advised he thought Smith was still alive and went to his patrol vehicle to retrieve “quick clot,” to assist with the bleeding and to secure his AK-47. Neither Stockley or Bianchi immediately secured the vehicle Smith was in with an alleged handgun inside of it. Officers are taught to immediately secure anyone that’s a suspect, for safety reasons. Neither Stockley or Bianchi felt the need to immediately secure someone Stockley and Bianchi claimed was armed. Stockley returned to his patrol car more than once with Smith allegedly armed with a handgun inside of a running vehicle. Numerous officers (8-9 other officers) stood around while Smith was in the car.

15. On one occasion, Stockley is seen on video giving a head nod to his Sergeant before going back to the police car. In the Sergeant’s memorandum to Homicide and his statement to the FBI he directed officers away from the vehicle to monitor a crowd that allegedly became large and hostile. The video shows the crowd was minimal.

16. On one occasion, when Stockley is inside of the police car, his back blocks some of the police In Car Camera view of him reaching into his work bag. Stockley completes this task from the rear driver’s side of his police vehicle, not the rear passenger side, where his bag is seated. Stockley stated at his trial he grabbed his “quick clot” from his work bag to aid Smith’s bleeding. A direct route to his bag with the “quick clot” would’ve been from the rear passenger side door. If Stockley would’ve retrieved items from the rear passenger side viewers would’ve presumably seen his actions better. Stockley stated he put the “quick clot” inside of a pocket after retrieving it from his bag. Stockley never renders aid to Smith with the “quick clot.”

17. Two of the first Officers on the scene advised of not seeing a gun in the vehicle with Smith. One of those officers is observed on video helping to remove Smith from the vehicle.

18. Former SLMPD Officer, Jason Stockley advised his partner, Officer Brian Bianchi, turned off the in car camera. This is a violation of SLMPD’s In Car Camera policy.

19. Stockley and Bianchi’s Sergeant should’ve immediately separated them per SLMPD procedures for Officer Involved Shootings. Stockley and Bianchi were allowed to walk through the scene contaminating evidence by searching the vehicle Smith was in and repeatedly returning to their patrol car. Stockley and Bianchi’s Sergeant had been on the scenes of other officer involved shootings, but failed to abide by the policy. Failing to separate the officers is a violation of SLMPD procedures.

20. The only DNA on the handgun belonged to Officer Jason Stockley. Stockley’s DNA was located underneath a screw. Stockley didn’t have on gloves when he made direct contact with the revolver. Stockley’s defense for the absence of Anthony Lamar Smith’s DNA was, “DNA is a very bizarre substance.” Stockley contaminated the scene by searching Smith’s vehicle with his bare hands. That’s a violation of SLMPD policy for preserving evidence.

In court, Stockley further stated it’s difficult to search while wearing gloves. SLMPD officers are taught in the Police Academy to search vehicles with gloves to prevent evidence from becoming contaminated. This is a normal law enforcement practice.

Stockley indicated at the trial he had a general idea of where he thought Smith’s alleged weapon was located. There was no need to search the vehicle. Stockley’s Sergeant advised he allowed Stockley to remove the gun because he was fearful someone from the large crowd would remove the evidence. Video evidence indicated there wasn’t a large crowd as his Sergeant stated in his original memorandum to SLMPD. Therefore, there was no real threat of evidence within the car being removed by someone from the crowd.

21. Stockley denied telling the FBI he had a small case in his work bag, which was small enough to fit a gun inside of the case.
Stockley advised some of the FBI’s report about his interview was inaccurate. Stockley further stated FBI summary reports are often inadmissible in court because their reports can be inaccurate.

In conclusion, the board of the Ethical Society of Police believes the actions of Jason Stockley were that of murder, and warrant a conviction.


The Board of the Ethical Society of Police

The Ethical Society of Police understands that this case may cause public frustration and we respect the citizen’s right to protest. However we do not condone any violence regardless of the court’s decision.”

About FOX 2 News

FOX 2 and KPLR 11 in St. Louis cover the news in Missouri and Illinois. There are over 68 hours of live news and local programming on-air each week. Our website and live video streams operate 24/7. Download our apps for alerts and follow us on social media for updates in your feed.

President Harry Truman said: “It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.” That spirit is alive and well at Fox 2. Our teamwork is on display each and every day.

Our news slogan is: “Coverage You Can Count On.” We quite frankly are too busy to worry about who gets the credit. Our main concern is serving the viewer.

We go where the stories take us. Whether it be Washington, D.C when a Belleville man opened fire during a congressional baseball game practice or to Puerto Rico where local Ameren crews restored power after more than 5 months in the dark.

Coverage You Can Count On means “Waking up your Day” with our top-rated morning show. From 4:00 am-10:00 am we are leading the way with breaking news. But our early morning crew also knows how to have some fun! Our strong commitment to the communities we serve is highlighted with our Friday neighborhood shows.

Our investigative unit consists of three reporters. Elliott Davis focuses on government waste, Chris Hayes is our investigative reporter, and Mike Colombo is our consumer reporter. They work in unison with the news department by sharing resources and ideas.

We continue to cover breaking news aggressively and relied on our seasoned journalists to make a difference with the stories we covered. The shooting of Arnold Police Officer Ryan O’Connor is just one example of that. Jasmine Huda was the only reporter who had exclusive access to the O’Connor family during his amazing rehabilitation in Colorado.

Last, but certainly not least, FOX 2 and KPLR 11 are committed to covering local politics. We host debates among candidates and have the most extensive presidential election coverage. Our commitment to politics isn’t just during an election year. We produce two political shows that air every weekend.


Latest News

More News