Senate Panel Looks At IRS Targeting Of Conservative Groups

News

U.S. Internal Revenue Service building, Washington D.C.

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

WASHINGTON, DC – The man who headed the Internal Revenue Service when it targeted some conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status offers his first public explanation of what happened Tuesday in an appearance before the Senate Finance Committee.

Douglas Shulman, who was IRS commissioner in 2010 when the targeting began, is one of three witnesses scheduled to appear at the second congressional hearing on the practice condemned by President Barack Obama and leaders of both parties.

Republicans contend the controversy is part of a pattern of a White House gone wild, while Democrats insist that what happened — while unacceptable — was initiated within the IRS instead of being a practice called for or supported by Obama.

New details emerged Monday of what the White House knew about the controversy, with spokesman Jay Carney disclosing Chief of Staff Denis McDonough was among the top officials made aware of the matter late last month.

In a new timeline provided by Carney to reporters, General Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler learned on April 24 of a pending Treasury inspector general’s report on how IRS staff used criteria that targeted some conservative groups in assessing eligibility for tax-exempt status.

According to Carney, Ruemmler told McDonough as well as other Treasury officials about the pending report. It was the first time the White House acknowledged that McDonough was aware of the report before it became public in early May.

In addition, Carney made clear that the information Ruemmler received on April 24 included details of improper acts by IRS officials.

At the same time, Carney emphasized that the information was preliminary and could have changed before the inspector general released his final report on May 14.

Carney insisted no one — including Ruemmler and McDonough — told Obama anything about the inspector general’s pending report before media reports about it began appearing on May 10.

“We knew the subject of the investigation and we knew the nature of some of the potential findings, but we did not have a copy of the draft report,” Carney said. “We did not know the details, the scope, or the motivation surrounding the misconduct and we did not know who was responsible. Most importantly, the report was not final and still very much subject to change.”

However, the new information on Monday continued a perception of a White House on the defensive over the issue, one of at least three controversies dogging Obama as his second term reaches the four-month mark.

The Senate Finance Committee’s Democratic chairman and ranking Republican sent a letter to the IRS on Monday seeking an exhaustive list of information about the case, and a third congressional hearing on the matter is set for Wednesday — this time by the House Oversight Committee.

Some Republicans are calling for a special investigation into the IRS matter, in which tax officers assessing applications for tax-exempt status used key words such as “tea party” in determining levels of scrutiny.

Meanwhile, a Northern California tea party group has filed the first lawsuit against the U.S. government stemming from the IRS targeting. The group, NorCal Tea Party Patriots, alleged violations under the Privacy Act as well as violations of its constitutional rights guaranteeing free expression and equal protection under the law.

Carney offered the new timeline in response to the first question at his daily media briefing, when a reporter noted “confusion” over what Ruemmler was told about the inspector general report in late April.

He noted the report found that there was no outside intervention regarding what he called “inappropriate scrutinizing of conservative groups” seeking tax-exempt status, and that no one in the White House intervened in the inspector general’s review or “did anything that could be see as intervening.”

In addition, Carney said, the misconduct had stopped in May 2012, almost a year before Ruemmler or anyone else at the White House was told of it by anyone at Treasury.

At the same time, Carney disclosed that White House and Treasury officials discussed the pending inspector general’s report in the weeks before its formal release, even though he said no one told Obama about it.

The White House first was notified of the upcoming report, known as an audit, on April 16, he said, calling that a routine notification also provided to Congress. Ruemmler was told about it eight days later and she informed McDonough and others about it shortly thereafter, Carney said.

“Ruemmler was informed that the inspector general for tax administration was completing a report about line IRS employees improperly scrutinizing what are known 501(c)(4) organizations by using words such as ‘tea party’ and ‘patriot’,” he said.

In particular, Carney said that “at no time did anyone on the White House staff intervene with the IRS inspector general audit.”

“There were communications between the White House Counsel’s office and White House Chief of Staff’s office with Treasury Office of General Counsel and Treasury’s Chief of Staff office to understand the anticipated timing of the release of the report and potential findings by the” inspector general, he said, but added that Ruemmler acted properly in not informing the president.

“The cardinal rule, as I said, is you do not intervene in an independent investigation and you do not do anything that would be, that would give such an appearance, particularly when the final conclusions, as was the case here, have not been reached,” Carney said. “That is the doctrine we followed and the bottom line is — and this isn’t just the most important fact, it is what we have said from the beginning — neither the White House nor Treasury intervened in the inspector general’s audit.”

Last week, acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller blamed a huge increase in workload, rather than deliberate targeting, for “foolish mistakes” relating to the political discrimination cited by the inspector general’s report.

He told the House Ways and Means Committee at the first congressional hearing on the matter that the IRS division handling requests for tax exempt status was overwhelmed by a surge that followed the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision.

“I think that what happened here was that foolish mistakes were made by people who were trying to be more efficient in their workload selection,” Miller said, calling the practices described in the inspector general’s report as “intolerable” and a “mistake,” but “not an act of partisanship.”

He apologized for what he later called “horrible customer service,” but he also stubbornly rejected any accusation that it amounted to politicizing the work of the IRS.

However, Republicans noted the increased requests for tax exempt status didn’t kick in until 2011, months after the targeting began, according to the inspector general’s report.

According to the inspector general’s report, the IRS developed and followed a faulty policy to determine whether the applicants were engaged in political activities, which would disqualify the groups from receiving tax-exempt status.

The controversial move began in early 2010 and continued for more than 18 months, the report said, declaring that “the IRS used inappropriate criteria that identified for review Tea Party and other organizations applying for tax-exempt status based upon their names or policy positions instead of indications of potential political campaign intervention.”

The conservative groups complain their requests were delayed for months or even years through the review process, which is intended to prevent ineligible political groups from getting tax-exempt status. Miller testified Friday that determining the political nature of groups was one of the hardest tasks of IRS officers responsible for assessing requests for tax exempt status.

The investigation by the Treasury inspector general for tax administration was initiated after congressional complaints began to surface in the media in 2012 that the IRS was targeting conservative groups and holding up applications.

In a written response included in the report, the IRS commissioner of the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division said there was no criminal behavior behind the actions of the agents, but rather inefficient management.

Obama called practices described by the inspector general outrageous and forced Miller’s resignation. In addition, the commissioner of the IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division also announced his retirement Thursday. Joseph Grant will leave in June, according to an internal IRS memo provided to CNN. Miller also is scheduled to exit then.

Obama has appointed Danny Werfel, a White House budget office official who has served in both Democratic and Republican administrations, to succeed Miller through the end of the fiscal year on September 30.

By Tom Cohen

CNN’s Jessica Yellin contributed to this report.

The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2013 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

Copyright 2021 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Popular

Latest News

More News