ST. LOUIS, MO (KTVI) – If an officer suspects you are driving in St. Louis City under the influence of alcohol, you can refuse a breath test. But, you might face a blood test whether you consent or not.
City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Police Chief Sam Dotson and Fire Chief Dennis Jenkerson planned a press conference Monday afternoon to announce a “No Refusal Zone” across St. Louis.
This issue has already been through the U.S. Supreme Court.
Missouri law says you can refuse to give a breath test, if police pull you over and suspect that you are driving drunk. But, the law does not protect you from certain consequences. Neither does a recent ruling by the nation’s highest court.
In Cape Girardeau County, an officer arrested Tyler McNeely in October 2010 for suspicion of DUI. McNeely refused to take a breath test. An officer took McNeely to the hospital and had his blood drawn, without a warrant.
Eight of the nine Supreme Court justices said that action violated the suspect’s fourth amendment protection from unnecessary search and seizure. Justice Sonya Sotomayor stated that police must first seek a search warrant for that blood. It looks like city officials plan to do that, each and every time a suspect refuses a breath test.
We also heard from Wentzville, Mo. Judge Mike Carter. He was found not guilty of DWI. In a written statement, he applauded the city’s efforts to catch drunk drivers. But, he called seeking a warrant for a blood test for each and every refusal “disturbing”.
Friend me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KimHudsonTV
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/kimhudsontv
Email me: firstname.lastname@example.org