This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

ST. LOUIS- The National Football League has not given up on efforts to get the lawsuit brought by local interests here over the Rams’ move to Los Angeles relocated out of St. Louis before the case potentially goes to trial as scheduled in January.

But as setbacks pile up on that front, you’re starting to see a wave of reporting and speculation, primarily from outlets which cover the NFL and are just now starting to report on a process that news outlets here have focused on over the last few years.

“There’s an acknowledgment in league circles of the possibility that giving St. Louis a new team could help resolve the case,” ProFootball Talk’s Mike Florio wrote earlier this week.

Ben Frederickson, a columnist for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and someone who has been keyed into the dynamics of the case, says the leaks of a possible settlement involving a team aren’t coming from St. Louis’ side.

Last week, FOX2 asked the offices of St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones and St. Louis County Executive Sam Page for comment about a preference for an expansion team or a cash settlement. Both declined comment citing the ongoing litigation.

In August, FOX2 asked in a Twitter poll what the best realistic outcome of a lawsuit could be for St. Louis.

An expansion team won a plurality of the votes, followed by a verdict at trial of more or less than $1 billion.

It’s important to note that either through a settlement or going to trial, a final result is going to be years away. Any trial verdict will be tied up in appeals. Even if an expansion team is part of a settlement, it could be 5-10 years before that club takes the field, presumably as part of an expansion from 32 to 34 teams.